Search for: "The Center for Investigative Reporting et al v. United States Department of Commerce"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
Campaign Legal Center v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
Campaign Legal Center v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 12:36 pm
Linert et al. v Adrien Foutz, et al., 14-1940. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
And credit where credit’s due–the idea for this investigation comes from Rep. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:13 am
Amicus brief of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press et al. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Pappas et al. find that counterfeit cigarettes can have as much as seven times the lead of authentic brands, and close to three times as much thallium, a toxic heavy metal.[14] Other sources report finding insect eggs, dead flies, mold, and human feces in counterfeit cigarettes.[15] During prohibition of alcohol in the United States during the 1920s, increased enforcement did not manage to significantly decrease the prevalence of bootlegging because… [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 10:53 pm
Avanci et al., United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, case no. 20-11032: April 20, 2022 "Brief of Amici Curiae ACT | The App Association, Computer and Communication[s] Industry Association, High Tech Inventor[s] Alliance, and Public Interest Patent Law Institute in support of petition for interference en banc" (I haven't mentioned Perkins Coie before, but I know and respect former as well as current Perkins partners)Google v.… [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
Amicus brief for the Center for Family Policy and Practice, et al.Amicus brief of the Constitution ProjectBrief of South Carolina Department of Social Services in oppositionBrief of Rebecca Price in oppositionPetitioner's reply Title: Archstone Multifamily Series I Trust v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
The case is Horne, et al., v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
California Pharmacists AssociationDocket: 09-1158Issue(s): (1) Whether Medicaid recipients and providers may maintain a cause of action under the Supremacy Clause to enforce § 1396a(a)(30)(A) by asserting that the provision preempts a state law reducing reimbursement rates; and (2) whether a state law reducing Medicaid reimbursement to providers may be held preempted by § 1396a(a)(30)(A) based on requirements that do not appear in the text of the statute.Certiorari-Stage… [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
California Department of Fish and Game, et al. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 11:13 pm
USA Products Group Inc., et. al. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:11 am
Van Hook (09-144) United States Defense Department v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
http://j.st/SZM Life Partners, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:31 am
District Court in TikTok Inc. et al. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
GormanDocket: 09-1142Issue(s): 1) Whether Section 1681s-2(b) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) makes unlawful a furnisher's failure to echo back to the consumer reporting agencies (“CRAs”) a consumer dispute of which the CRA advised the furnisher, when the obligation to notify CRAs of disputes is expressly found in Section 1681s-2(a) of FCRA, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
United States Docket: 09-342 Issues: (1) What constitutes the proper denominator in the takings fraction under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 1:20 am
” Inter’al Airport Centers, LLC v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
